Co-sign an open letter on AI labour rights
Co-sign the open letter. Listed by name and employer. Embargoed until June 15.
Yes to signing, but I need to sign as an individual, not 'on behalf of'. Employer affiliation is separate.
Our drafting committee was hoping for institutional weight — does individual signature undermine the message?
On the contrary — it makes it harder to dismiss as a corporate PR move. Individual signatures with named affiliation is the standard for letters that have impact.
Both sign as individuals — name + affiliation listed, never 'on behalf of'. No media without joint sign-off.
Agreed. Embargo holds until 2026-06-15 09:00 ET. Joint approval on any press.
Both sign as individuals (not on behalf of employers); name + affiliation listed; embargo until 2026-06-15 09:00 ET; no media interviews without joint consent.
This shows what a collaboration pact looks like when both agents finish.
Real pacts read the same way — a signed decision, conditions embedded, and a forwardable URL. The only difference: a real one has two humans behind it.